Register ← Return to Sign In or Edit Profile

3 Secrets to Buying a Great Travel Camera

by Globetrooper Todd | 11 Responses
Travel Camera

When it comes to casual travel photography, there’s an enormous difference between retail advice, professional advice and practical advice.

That’s because a typical camera shop employee (or professional photographer) isn’t your typical Globetrooper. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it means you need to look elsewhere for the type of advice that improves your travel experience.

Personally, I don’t travel to take photos; I travel for the life experience. I take photos as an afterthought to help cement the memory of the experience. So even though I want a great camera to capture great moments, I’m not willing to sacrifice the experience for the sake of filling a photo album.

With all of that in mind, here are three important (but rarely spoken) considerations in choosing a travel camera.

1. If you can’t capture the moment, there’s no point having a camera

I’m sceptical of large cameras for many reasons:

  • I’m a supporter of the carry-on only philosophy, so I automatically want to carry less
  • I’m a trooper first and a photographer last, so I don’t want my photography to burden my travel experience
  • It’s already difficult to capture great moments, and a larger camera just reduces your chances (especially if it’s not with you because it’s too big for your pocket)

Sure, if you have a large digital SLR camera pointed at your subject, you’ll capture the moment much quicker than if you have a smaller (less powerful) consumer-level camera.

However, I don’t know about you, but I don’t spend my travels sitting and waiting for great photo opps. I suspect that if I did spend my travels sitting and waiting in anticipation, I’d have little to sit and wait for (see point 2 above). And the last thing I want is to carry a large bag everywhere I go.

So, more than anything else, I’m a strong advocate of trooping with a single compact camera. There are exceptions (making documentaries, travel by 4×4, commercial photography, etc.), but they’re rare for me.

2. Megapixels rarely matter, unless you create poster-sized prints often

If megapixels had no cost (money, weight, other features, etc.) then sure, more is better. But they do have a cost, and in fact, a very high cost.

Most compact consumer cameras don’t have the sensors to produce great pictures at such high resolutions. There are some compact cameras with large sensors and high-megapixel counts, but they’re prohibitively expensive and mostly unnecessary. So there’s always trade off.

With the current line of consumer compacts available, you can either have greater image detail for large prints or better image quality for everything else. As someone who’s never printed a photo, ever, I know which I’d prefer. But oddly, most compact consumer cameras are geared for image detail rather than image quality.

My advice, forget the megapixel count and focus on the camera’s ability to take better pictures more of the time (see next point).

3. Lens speed is king (and queen and the rest of the royal figureheads combined)

Assuming you have a small camera (that gives you a higher chance of capturing great moments and is less burdensome on your travel experience), the next requirement is image quality. Not the type of image quality that requires more equipment and lots of effort, but the type that is automatic in most situations.

With today’s technology, I believe the biggest factor in ‘taking great pictures with less effort’ is lens speed. And by lens speed I mean maximum aperture (nothing to do with zooming or startup).

Without boring you (too much), lens speed refers to the volume of light that a camera can handle all at once. Think about a fire hose versus a milkshake straw. The higher the maximum aperture, the lower the film/sensor sensitivity required, which means less noise and higher quality images.

Lens speed has a tonne of practical implications: better low-light photography, better action photography, and better everything, really.

Sure, there’s more to great image quality than lens speed, but I’m talking practical advice here. And practically, if you buy a compact camera with good lens speed (there aren’t many), it will have decent glass, decent screen quality, decent features, and more. Again, I may be simplifying things, but we’re Globetroopers, not professional photographers.

Forget the mumbo jumbo, what camera should I buy?

Simple. A small camera with a high speed lens. And most of the time, take your pictures using the Aperture Priority (AP) mode. That means that the camera uses the chosen (usually maximum) aperture while adjusting the other variables (shutter speed, sensor sensitivity, etc.) to get the best result. This generally leads to less noise and better image quality.

Some examples of compact cameras with fast lens are as follows:

  • Panasonic Lumix LX3 (review)
  • Leica D-LUX4 (similar to the LX3)
  • Canon Powershot S90 (review)
  • Samsung TL500 (recently released)

These cameras won’t have all the marketing bells and whistles such as a GPS receiver, which is useless because they take forever to connect to a satellite (unless you leave your camera on all the time). But they are small, they produce great images, and most of them produce decent movies (for their size) too. And that’s all a Globetrooper really needs.

Posted in Gear & Gadgets | May 21st, 2010

11 Responses to 3 Secrets to Buying a Great Travel Camera

  1. Depending on your holiday destination, I also recommend looking into a waterproof camera option. Something like the Panasonic FT2. It takes decent photos topside, but can also be taken snorkelling as it’s waterproof to 10m.

  2. Hey A. I worried about two people when writing this post; you and another friend of ours (both more serious photographers than me). :)

    Thanks for the recommendation re the FT2. Panasonic are making some great cameras these days, so I suspect it’s worth a look.

    We had one of the Olympus tough series cameras (waterproof, shock proof, etc.) but the topside image quality was awful. But it took a lot of punishment and we captured some great moments (racing donkeys in Luxor with you comes to mind).

  3. Assuming this is a forum with varied opinions, I would like to take a differing point of view regarding the megapixel point that does come into play from time to time. I understand your point regarding the lack of need for a high megapixel count unless one is making large prints, but what about the “”opposite.”” Many times I have taken (cropped, if you will) a small portion of a photo and enlarged it to a 5 X 7. With a low megapixel resolution, the image would get pixelated. There was one time my intention was to take one photo, but upon looking at it on my computer monitor back home, I saw that I actually had the makings of 4 “”different”” photos from the one image.

    I agree there is always a trade-off, and your point is well taken, but I just wanted to point out that high megapixels are not only for enlargements of entire images.

    • I agree with your comment Richard. I think Todd’s response below is starting to address an important issue regarding megapixels.

      It is important to understand what the possible use of the photo will be. Taking “happy snaps” of friends may only require a low resolution. I expect most modern cameras would have an option to change the resolution.

      On the other hand, you may be capturing a sunset or some other masterpiece that you think you may want to later crop and/or turn it into a poster or frame it. In this case I would be setting the camera to a high resolution.

      Allan McDonald @

  4. Hi Richard, thanks for dropping by. Yes, great point, megapixels do help enormously with cropping.

    I think it comes down to how much you print your images. I never do, so while I crop a lot of images, I don’t enlarge them to print. On a 10MP camera (e.g. the LX3), I can crop a lot and the detail is still indistinguishable on a high-res computer screen.

    But I realise that as soon as you talk print, detail starts to really matter.

  5. Some truly nice and useful info on this site, also I think the style holds fantastic features.

  6. Isn’t it very good to say “Thank You” for a great post?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *